Connect with us


How former Lagos Speaker Ikufori diverted N14.7m – Witness



An investigator with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Adebayo Adeniyi, told Justice Muhammed Liman of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos …

Former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Adeyemi Ikufori, diverted the sum of N14.7m through his aide and co-defendant, Oyebode Alade.

The first prosecution witness, Adebayo Adeniyi, an investigator with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC has said.

Both Ikuforiji and Alade were re-arraigned on Wednesday, December 11, 2019 on a 54-count charge bordering on conspiracy and money laundering to the tune of N338.8million.

One of the counts reads: “That you, Rt. Honourable Adeyemi Sabit Ikuforiji and Oyebode Alade Atoyebi, sometime between April 2010 and July 2011 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable court, conspired among yourselves to do an illegal act to wit: accepting various cash payments amounting in the aggregate to the sum of N338, 801, 442 (Three Hundred and Thirty-Eight Million, Eight Hundred and One Thousand, Four Hundred and Forty Naira only) from the Lagos State House of Assembly without going through a financial institution and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2011 and punishable under Section 16 (2) (b) of same Act.”

The defendants pleaded not guilty to the charge preferred against them by the EFCC, thereby leading to their trial.

At the resumed hearing on September 30, Adeniyi, in his testimony, said he had worked with the Commission for 15 years, adding that his schedule of duty included investigation, search as well as any other duty relating to investigation.

Led in evidence by the prosecution counsel, Ekene Iheanacho, Adeniyi also told the court that, in June 2011, a petition was written against the first defendant for allegedly siphoning the sum of N500million monthly from the Lagos House of Assembly.

According to him, upon receipt of the petition, the EFCC commenced investigation and subsequently visited the office of the then Clerk of the House of Assembly in Lagos, where relevant documents were recovered.

The PWI, who said the development led to the Clerk being invited to the Commission, further stated that “We recovered some payment registers and when we went through them, we discovered that a lot of cash payments were made to the second defendant. So, we invited him to explain why the payments were made to him.

“He told us that the payments were meant for the first defendant.

“When we interrogated the first defendant, he actually confirmed that the second defendant was collecting the monies for him.”

When the prosecution counsel, Iheanacho, asked the witness to identify a bulk of documents, he( the witness)identified pages one to 12 of the documents as being the statement of the first defendant, pages 13 to 24 as the statement of the second defendant and pages 25 to 237 as other documents recovered from the clerk’s office.

Iheanacho then sought to tender the documents before the court, which the defence counsel, Dele Adesina, SAN, did not oppose.

Consequently, the court admitted the statements of the defendants as exhibits A, B and B1.

The court also admitted a search bundle as exhibit C, a cash release register ETD as exhibits D, a document tagged “Chili Bulk 2010 “as exhibit E, and another bulk document as exhibit E1.

When asked to narrate his findings from the investigation, the witness told the court that the EFCC discovered that a series of cash payments were made to the second defendant, which were above the threshold allowed by the Money Laundering Act.

The witness said that in exhbit E, which contains then the transaction of April 30, 2010, the sum of N3 million was collected by the second defendant on behalf of the first defendant, adding that “On April 27, 2010, N10 million was collected in cash by the second defendant; and on May 6, 2010, the cash sum of N1.7 million was also collected by the second defendant on behalf of the first defendant.”

At this juncture, the court urged the parties to make progress in the case, which he said had spanned a period of almost 10 years since 2011.

In view of this, Iheanacho asked for an adjournment to enable him arrange the documents to be tendered.

The defence counsel, Adesina ,did not oppose the prayer of the prosecution counsel for adjournment.

The case was adjourned to October 14, 2020 for continuation of trial.



Website | + posts
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Osun Govt. Dragged To Court Over Dissolution Of Statutory Commissions



The Chairmen and members of the Statutory Commissions dissolved on 30th October, 2023 by the Osun State government have filed multiple law suits challenging the dissolution.

In separate four law suits filed at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Ibadan and signed by their counsel, Muhydeen Adeoye Galadima Esq on 13th November, 2023, the Claimants, urged, among other reliefs, the court to nullify the dissolution and direct the Osun State to stop giving further effect to the purported constitution of the new Commissions.

The claimants also prayed the court ask the State government to pay damages in the sum of 500,000,000.00 to them in each suit.

The commissions are Osun State Judicial Service Commission, Osun State Independent Electoral Commission OSSIEC, Osun State Civil Service Commission and Osun State House of Assembly Service Commission.

Joined as Defendants in the suits are Governor of Osun State, Attorney General of Osun State, Commissioner for Finance Osun State and Osun State House of Assembly.

+ posts
Continue Reading


Court sentences 5 To 5yrs Imprisonment for defrauding Osun Ex-Speaker N38m



A federal high court in Osogbo on Tuesday has convicted five persons for defrauding the immediate past Speaker of Osun State House of Assembly the sum of thirty eight million naira (N38m) in 2018.

The defendants in the case, kazeem agbabiaka, Femi Oyebode, Babatunde Oluajo, Adebiyi Kehinde Oseni, Oyebanji Oyeniyi and Rasheed Ojonla were facing a 5-count charge before the court, bothering on conspiracy to defraud, obtaining under false pretence, public ridicule and cyber crime.

Delivering his judgement, justice Emmanuel Ayoola described the convicted as a web of syndicates who did not deserve to be in the society without a reform thereby sentencing the five of them who were found guilty and convicted to five years imprisonment each.

The 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th defendants, Kazeem Agbabiaka, Femi Oyebode, and Babatunde Oluajo respectively were convicted and sentenced to 5years imprisonment having been found guilty of the 1st and 2nd count charge.

He however discharged and acquitted the 7th defendant, Ismaila Azeez, on the count charge bothering on cyberbullying while Kehinde Oseni was found guilty of the same charge and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.

Recall that a video was released on social media where it was alleged that Timothy Owoeye was bathing with blood in the middle.

The video was said to have been released by one of the convits, Kehinde Oseni in an attempt to blackmail Owoeye after he was duped during his bid to become the Speaker of Osun State House of Assembly.

+ posts
Continue Reading


Exclusive: Osun State Judiciary Enmeshed In Corruption Allegations



The judiciary is said to be the last hope of common man. It is the third arm of the government and is held in a very high esteem. The protection of its sanctity is sacrosanct to promoting a just society.

These and other reasons prompted the Dailymail to investigate into various allegations brewing up in the Osun State Judiciary.

It was rumoured in some quarters that some fund was released for upgrading of the High Court Library and provision of diaries for the staff and judicial officers. The allegation over this is that no such upgrading nor provision of the diaries was done. It was said that the Customary Court of Appeal which is different from the High Court however did its own.

Similarly, it was said that some legal crises erupted following the execution of judgment in HIK/41/2018 between Quqdri Lateef & Ors v. AMD Global Concept. The crises led to mutiple filing of court processes and the judgment was set aside by the Hon. Justice A. O. Ayoola on the ground that the court that delivered the judgment was misled on facts. A panel of enquiry was constituted and some staff members were suspended for a period of two months in the year 2020. However, findings revealed that up till this time of filing this report in the year 2023, the suspension has not been lifted.

The disturbing aspect of the case is that substantial part of salaries due to the suspended staff members were said to have been collected by yet to be identified person.

It was said that another panel of enquiry has been constituted by the Chief Judge to look into the allegation of the deducted salaries. However, some human rights activists have raised a concern about the constitution of the panel as it was alleged that three out of the five members of the panel were involved in the allegations therefore the panel was a possible way to cover up the mess or transfer the blame to some innocent people who had no control on how to spend any penny coming into the pocket of the Judiciary.

After three years, the two-month suspension issued in the year 2020 has long time expired but was not lifted and as a result of which it was said to have become illegal.

There were allegations from unconfirmed sources that the Chief Judge may have dictated to the members of the Panel, the recommendations they should make on the staff under suspension. It was also rumoured that they received a directive that the panel should not release its report until after she arrives from vacation in United States of America.

It was also alleged that suspension has long expired and its continuity is now illegal, the affected members of staff were allegedly prevented by the Chief Judge from attending promotion interview excercise, which she presides by virtue of his position as Chairman, Osun State Judicial service Commission.

Findings revealed that the affected parties by the setting aside in Suit HIK/41/2018 Between Quqdri Lateef & Ors v. AMD Global Concept commenced appeal but same was stalled over sudden disappearance of the case file and a development that had made compilation of the record very impossible.

In another development, an exhibit in one criminal case at the Osun State High Court is allegedly said missing from the court record. Finding showed that it was a case of armed robbery in Ikirun sometimes in the year 2020. Some suspects were arrested by the police in connection with the robbery. The suspects were charged to court in Charge No. HIk/8C/2020 Between The State v. Nuhu Jimoh & Ors. The accused persons were convicted to death and the sum of #7,486,300.00 recovered from the robbers was directed to be forfeited to the State government coffer.

However, it was alleged that the sum of #7,486,300.00 was neither remitted to the State government coffer as directed by the court nor paid back to the bank but is missing from the record.

Unconfirmed sources further revealed that appointment of over 50 staff was made while none of those categories of staff ever attended job interview, and there is no record of advertisement of the vacancies for the past five years.

It was also gathered that the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria, Osun State Chapter (JUSUN) may also be contemplating sending a SOS to the Governor of Osun State, Senator Ademola Adeleke, and Chief Justice of Nigeria, on the plight of their members over the injustice being metted to them.

It was also alleged that the National Judicial Council is misled into appointing Judges, when there are no structures on ground. This is a basic condition for appointment of Judges. For example, a motor dealer was alleged to have been engaged to hire four new vehicles for a few days, when NJC team came to verify whether the last set of Judges would have official vehicles, and official residence or not. After the inspection, the motor dealer was paid off, and drove his vehicles away. The situation now, as alleged, in Osun State Judiciary is that the last set of four Honourable Judges who were appointed over one year ago do not have official cars or official quarters. It took those that were appointed immediately before the last set, more than two (2) years after their appointment, before they too got official vehicles.

While all the above remains within the realm of speculation, efforts were made to verify the facts from the concerned people. A call was put to the Chief Registrar of the High Court of Justice, Osun State, Mr. Isola Omisade to respond to the various allegations.

Omisade said he’s not allowed to speak to the press unless he’s given permission.

One of the suspended staff members of the Osun State judiciary, Mrs Fasina Tope declined comment by simply saying “please let me just be” when she was called to speak on the development.

Our curiosity for verification of those alleged facts further led us to put a call to another staff, Mr Wale who is also on suspension.

Reacting to the issue, Mr Wale stated that “We were given two months suspension and extra on month, that was November, 2020 to early January to February 2021. We are still not called back to work. We don’t know why. Even though we were charged to court and we were given judgment, discharged and acquainted but since then nothing has been done.”

On the allegation of their salary deductions every month, he said “Some parts of our salaries were being taken to the account section of the judiciary to avoid removing how name from the payroll, that is why they are doing that.”

On whether they will later be paid their deducted salaries, Mr Wale, said “It seems so because I heard from that office that they are calling them to make necessary account of the money of individual .

On why they have not been reinstated, Mr Wale said “we don’t even know yet because the judgement was, I think, July last year, since then till now, that it a year that judgement was given in our favour but nothing was done.

“Though they called us recently, a panel was set up as regards that. On the 22nd of August, they called and questioned us on what is going on with the salaries, why we are returning it back, how are we doing it and we told them that we are returning the money to the account section on the directive of the Director of that department. They about the outcome of the judgement, I told them and they asked for the judgement of the court. So we are still waiting for the outcome of the panel.”

On his own, Mr. Jones who was one of the counsel in Suit HIK/41/2018 Between Quqdri Lateef & Ors v. AMD Global Concept was called to speak on whether it was true that the case file was missing and the appeal could not proceed. Mr. Jones told DailyMail that he was once one of the counsels in the case. He confirmed that the case file actually was said to have been declared missing.

By and large, Dailymail is of the opinion that the Judiciary in the state should ensure that its integrity is not stained and therefore should look into these allegations and do the needful where at all it is necessary.

+ posts
Continue Reading


Copyright © 2023 Daily Mail NG. powered by CrownTech.